One of the things that I’m getting more and more hurt by, as I’m getting older, is seeing people who I looked up to when I was younger become lesser people. The biggest example of this is Bill Maher. I used to love Religulous. I used to love his stand up. Now, I can’t even bother with either of them, because the man has turned into everything he once stood against. He used to be against government authority. Now he is all for it. He used to be against the plutocracy that we have been living in, now he is all for it. He used to be an iconoclast, and now he is all for religiously motivated bigotry. All under the banner of being “anti-woke.”
“Woke.” The term that haunts so many conservative people and they make such a fuss about, but one that you can’t even get a solid definition on. Ask ten conservatives what “woke” is, and they’ll give you at LEAST five different answers. Likely closer to ten. Yet, this term, this nebulous term that they can’t even give a concrete definition of (I bet Richard Dawkins can’t give you a concrete definition of it either), they are painting as being on the level of a religion. That’s right, “woke”, a term without ANY defined limitations or rules or parameters of what makes something fall into it or not, is a religion.
So claims the likes of intellectually-vacant Jordan Peterson. A man whose talks are more word salad than actual “philosophy,” and who is a huckster who is grifting the conservative audience for all their worth. Much like Ben Shapiro. And guess who agrees with him? Richard Dawkins! That’s right, one of the foremost atheists living today, is in agreement with a moron who can barely speak in coherent sentences and who argues that atheists are bad people. It baffles me to think about. It baffles me to believe this.
What’s more, Dawkins believes that the religion of woke is on the same level as the nation Orwell wrote about in 1984. The autocratic authoritarian nation that he was warning us about. A nation where people saw God in the power of the state. Dawkins is saying that’s what “woke” is analogue to.
It makes me so sad, to see this happening. To see people I looked up to becoming these sad, empty shells of what they once were. People who once were articulate and who could be skeptical now take things without a single HINT of skepticism. That’s where Richard Dawkins is now. It breaks my fucking heart.
So when Peterson asked him the question – is “woke” a religion, his answer was yes. An ideology that they can’t even define has the hallmarks of religion. What are those hallmarks? Well, firstly, there is “Heretic Hunting.” He took some statements people clearly made online about their hatred of TERFs, and warped that into a statement about how “woke” culture as a whole wants to assault and kill the people who disagree.
I don’t know if it was a year or two ago, but there was Uhaul truck that was stopped, on its way to a Pride event. The truck was filled with heavily armed men associated with a militia. Their stated goal was to go to the Pride event and kill as many people as humanly possible. The truck being stopped is the only thing that saved the lives of God-knows how many people. There are trans people here in the US who are being killed, same with gay and lesbian people. To say nothing of the outside world where, in some nations, it’s law of the land to kill the LGBT. All of this is religiously motivated bigotry. And here we have Richard fucking Dawkins saying that “woke” is trying to hunt down the dissenters. How many TERFs have been killed? None that I’ve ever heard of. Heart a plethora of stories of being being murdered, raped, and beaten, because of being trans or gay or lesbian or black or Asian (especially during the pandemic), and now Arabic is growing again, because of what’s happening in Israel. The fact that Dawkins can say this with a straight face…fucking pisses me off.
My best friend is a lesbian girl who lost her family when she was outed as gay in high school. She lost everything. Her parents decided they don’t love her anymore, because of her homosexuality. She’s now engaged to a wonderful woman who is serving in the military. Serving her country, as a bi woman. My friend, I remember, had her swim team uniform defaced with threats of rape. Our red state community turned a blind eye. But Richard Dawkins is saying that the TERFs are the ones who are at risk. The fucking intellectual dishonesty on display is absolutely insane. How he sleeps at night, I’ll never know.
Dawkins say that the “minimum” of what will happen to you is that you’ll be tarred and feathered on Twitter. No, that’s pretty much where the buck stops. You will be shown for what you are on social media. Not the end of the world. You can close it down and go away for a few years and people will move on. But this is the horrible situation that Dawkins is saying is the “minimum.” To say nothing of the conservatives who will come out of the woodwork in support of your bigoted ass.
What is the maximum? You’ll lose your job. Oh my, the horror. You act like a bigot online and you get called out for it an you have consequences. Poor dears. You know, if I punch some random person in the face, I have consequences. They might punch me back, when they would have the right to do. They might call the police and press charges. They have that right too. My actions had consequences, and I have to deal with them. If a person is saying hateful things in a public forum that anyone can read, does it not follow that they should have consequences for what they put out into the world? Makes sense to me. Ain’t like Dawkins ever lost a job to saying something “anti-woke”? No. Feel free to prove me wrong.
Of course, he then says that if a woman says she’s black, she’s vilified, but if a woman says she’s a man, then saying otherwise is wrong. He DELIBERATELY misconstrues sex and gender, because of course he does. Of course he does. He buys into this conservative mindset, probably because he’s old, that when people are transgender, they are saying they are trans-sex. I guess nobody has ever explained to big-brain dumb-shit Richard Dawkins that there is a difference between sex and gender. Yes, sex is dimorphic with humans, but gender is a construct. Something that exists in your head. You may feel that you fit the sex that you are, biologically, or you might not. You may be born with the body of a woman, but feel more like a man, and vice-versa. This isn’t that fucking hard, and now we have Richard Dawkins choosing to be smug in his ignorance of it. Because of course he is.
Never mind that this idea that the trans community are only allowed to get support by popular culture is bullshit! Find a famous trans person and you’ll see people who are virulently against it! By people who are popular themselves! There is no clear indication of which side is going to win out on this, or if it will be a social stalemate for generations.
Dawkins says that cops are fine with a trans woman being identified as a woman and raping other women. He doesn’t give a name to this, which is frustrating, because I don’t know what example he’s talking about. I’m assuming he’s talking about a case of a trans woman in prison that I remember Matt Taibbi talking about. This one case of a very bad person doing very bad things. Not the norm, but an outlier. Never mind that if they had thrown the trans woman in a male prison, she likely would have been raped and murdered. We’ve seen how the criminal population treats those who identify as trans. But I guess Dawkins doesn’t care about that. One more dead person is no never-mind to him. God knows, he doesn’t seem to give a shit about the LGBT people who are being murdered by religious bigots now, so why would he care?
Boiled down to its simplest parts, he is bitching about cancel culture. Never mind that this isn’t unique to the “woke” community. Conservatives are just as big about it and just as virulent against apostates to their ideology of choice. They’re just mad that they are getting push-back from the community they hate for ENTIRELY RELIGIOUS REASONS!
Next up, we get to “hereditary guilt.” He’s essentially saying that the “woke” community believes in Original Sin. That people are guilty by virtue of their existence. That all white people have it because of slavery and colonial oppression. I would never be so stupid as to say that being born white means that you are automatically better off than someone who isn’t, but I will say this – the odds are a lot better for you, depending on what part of the country I live in that you come from. We don’t even have to go as far back as slavery.
Let’s look at the war on drugs here in the US. The single biggest failure of law enforcement. It is CLEARLY racially motivated. White and black people do drugs at commensurate rates, yet guess who is VASTLY over-represented in prison populations? Never mind the fact that the CIA introduced crack cocaine into black communities during the civil rights era. The war on drugs has led to the abject destruction of countless communities, both Latino and black, in major cities. That’s systemic racism that is happening now! Right now!
Should we hold it against all white people that they were born with the skin color they have? Of course not. But to acknowledge them systemic forces that are racist as fuck and destroying the communities of color is something we absolutely should do. Dawkins can’t even argue this honestly! Of course he can’t. That would show that he’s full of shit. It would show that he can’t do basic cause and effect. That’s the person we’re dealing with in this stupid debate.
And of course, it comes back to the trans community. It always does. Man, the thing which bums me is out is that Dawkins won’t live to when we have the cybernetics to really go nuts with people who have body dysmorphia and really want to change things up. How would Dawkins react when not only can people change the basics of their physical body, but can even go so far as to change the very deepest parts with cybernetics. Like when two twins get neural oscillation synchs that allows them to have a brain that works as one. One mind in two bodies. What would he say about that? What would he say when someone who is transgender not only can change their genitals, but the genitals they get are fully functioning cybernetics? When they can have just as fulfilling romance and sex lives as cis people, while being able to go all the way with it?
Dawkins is so deliberately obtuse about the difference between sex and gender. He is saying that the transgender community is transsexual, and that’s not what most of them are saying. He is conflating the two terms, in the most intellectually dishonest way, all so he can make a point that he wants to make. All agreeing with another intellectually dishonest huckster, Jordan Peterson. You know that someone has explained the difference to him before. Someone has done this, and yet he is feigning ignorance, because he is annoyed about the “woke” culture. This man chooses to ignore things that have been explained, stubbornly refusing to engage, because he doesn’t like it. He doesn’t even try to refute the concept that gender is separate from sex. Instead, he doesn’t even acknowledge it. A man of science. A shame that all that education and potential is being wasted.
Well, that’s it, then. Richard Dawkins, someone I had looked up to as an intellectual, has deliberately embraced dogmatic disdain for the transgender community, and in doing so has sided with people who hate ALL of the LGBT. Who think they all live in sin and deserve to be erased from this world. Who argue that drag queens are “groomers” and who say that the LGBT are pedophiles. These are the people he is siding with, all because he saw some ugly things said on Twitter, which is where intellectual discourse has always gone to die. Anyone who takes what is said on Twitter seriously and think there is a serious conversation happening there is a moron.
Richard Dawkins is now a moron, and it breaks my fucking heart.
Until next time, a quote,
“I know. Everyone wants the people they like to be right. That’s why popular people are fucking dumb.” – Rick Sanchez, Rick and Morty
Peace out,
Maverick