What is Your Problem With Women? (A response to Feminist Frequency)

You ever notice something – Anita Sarkeesian and her man-slave Josh McIntosh don’t like women. Check that – they don’t like women’s bodies.  At all.  Video after video where they make a very big to-do after how women look when they are in video games.  Their latest video is where they FINALLY lay out all of their excuses why they haven’t kept ANY of their Kickstarter promises.  Wait, no, that’s wrong.  We’ll never get that video.  When Leo Pirate did his open letter asking the two for a refund of his Kickstarter money (linked here), all that got him was blocked by Feminist Frequency’s Twitter.  Yeah, because they are all about talking to their critics, am I right?

I am posting this as a response to Feminist Frequency because if you looked at the post on their Kickstarter about their project, it’s become abundantly clear that Sarkeesian wants out of all of this.  I already figured it before, but now I know.  Her next videos are going to be brief little 5-10 minutes bullshits, and as I saw with today’s video, it is SO much troll-bait.  After all, why bother trying to talk about something when you can just get the trolls to go after you? The alternative is that Anita REALLY has a problem with women, their bodies, or REALLY wants to just look at men’s bodies.  Why do I bring that up?  Simple – because her latest video is all about comparing women’s asses to men for six and a half minutes.  Let me show you the video, then we can talk about it.  Because unlike some people, I actually do want to talk about things, and it means something to me when there can be discourse.  Josh-y boy and his owner Anita don’t.  Although, I guess Anita isn’t his owner anymore.

Let me put a thought out there before we do this – Anita doesn’t want to be a part of Feminist Frequency anymore.  She’s tired of it.  Not hard to see why.  Gaming is tired of her.  They are tired of her man-slave.  Even feminism seems bored with her.  Now they’ve moved on to other social movements to invade and take apart.  The tide of the war against social justice in gaming looks to be turning.  It’s slow, sure, but there’s progress.  That’s a start, right?  Anita wants to be in a classroom.  It’s where she never left, and it’s where she wants to go.  The bulk of her money comes from speaking engagements, where she can go to wonderful echo chambers and not have to deal with anyone questioning her.  After all, as we’ve learned in the University of California system, questioning accusations is now punishable.  Anita wants to be a podium lecturing in a safe space.  This video games war is somewhere that we can fight back, and she’s found out how ugly the fight can be.  So much so that she actually went to the UN and compared actual oppression of women in countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran to her being told she sucks on the Internet.  It’s amazing, really.  She wants to ditch Feminist Frequency, and let her man-slave take over.  My money is on most of the videos in the future being made by the man-slave.  Anita is tired of what she’s gotten wrapped up in, and wants to hand it off.  She’s no longer the face of her channel.  She’s been replaced by a logo.  Once she leaves, I doubt I will ever talk about this channel again.  So let’s enjoy it while we can, right?

Just when you think it’s all going to be about hot women in games (that both men AND women enjoy.  Because the day Feminist Frequency acknowledges lesbian and bisexual women is the day the hottest parts of Hell freeze over), you then see the Feminist Frequency logo pop up.  Damn it all.  And you’re right, Anita.  A girl’s butt won’t tell me all about her.  But you seem to believe that a character with a nice ass suddenly doesn’t have anything else to offer.  I’m amazed this video didn’t use any footage from your pal Valis.  He’s captured footage in games where he ogles at women’s asses for just that purpose.  Don’t know who I’m talking about?  Get a load of this.  There are plenty of good characters in games who have a nice ass to look at.  Like a character from a bad game – Lightning, in Final Fantasy XIII.  That game sucks, but the main character is interesting.  She’s well-acted.  And she has a great ass.  I care more about the fact that she is well-acted, and the high point of an otherwise-terrible game, but still.  So your point is kind of mute.  I don’t look at a girl’s ass to get to know her personality.  I talk to her for that.  But a nice ass is a nice ass, and that’s totally fine.  Women who wear yoga pants are aware of what they are doing, you know.  If it’s cool in real life, then what the fuck is the problem with it in video games?  Part of me thinks that you have a problem with women, Anita.

With all the time you spend complaining about seeing a woman’s ass, do you have a problem with women, Anita?  You go on at length about men’s asses, and your blase tone almost shows signs of perking up.  Liking a nice ass on a man, Anita?  That’s totally cool.  A nice ass is a nice ass to me.  Don’t know where you are.  See, Anita doesn’t seem to understand that women’s asses are the way they are for a reason.  It’s an evolutionary reason.  Back when were apes in trees, a nice ass was something that a male would notice.  It was designed to attract the males.  Just like how breasts developed to attract the males when we became bi-pedal, the ass was there when we weren’t.  This point matters when you look at her video overall.  Because her entire argument seems to boil down to – female ass = bad!  Need more man ass!  So either she is scientifically illiterate (a trait commonly shared by these feinting-couch feminists), or just REALLY wants to see man-ass, and doesn’t want to see female.  There are whole segments where she is ogling men’s asses in games!  Is she trolling, at this point?

We get her shoddy statements that are made with NO citation of any kind.  Basically – man see ass.  Man like ass.  Man objectify woman because ass.  She even argues that seeing an ass hardwires men to view women sexually.  A contention with NO evidence.  Of any kind.  Anywhere.  Somebody prove me wrong.  She argues that there are great lengths gone to to cover up men’s asses.  Citation?  You know what the developers are thinking?  That’s a stretch.  Especially since you have NEVER shown that you understand game development in the slightest.  I just love how she keeps harping on Bayonetta.  This is a go-to game for people like her, and ALL of them seem to just deliberately forget that this character was designed by a woman.  She was designed as a power fantasy.  That is the kind of character she wishes she could be.  A character in control of her sexuality and not afraid of her body.  The exact opposite of modern puritanical feminists.

Anita makes this really weird argument that Max in Life is Strange is a good representation of women’s butts in a game, saying that they don’t show off her ass.  Hey Anita, you do realize that there is a scene in this game where both the female protagonists are in their underwear in a swimming pool?  And they don’t shy away from the fact that they have female bodies.  This is why people say that Anita isn’t a gamer.  Because it’s abundantly clear that the information she gets is second-hand, and she never plays these games herself.

She then makes the argument that the over-the-shoulder camera angle in games is done to hide men’s asses.  Are you kidding me?!  This has to be trolling.  At this point, it’s abundantly clear that Anita isn’t trying anymore, and made this whole video just to stir up dust.  That was it.  She just wants to rile people up for her “look at the hate” stuff for her conferences or the next time she gets to tell her sob-story to the UN.  She wants out, so she isn’t bothering to even try.

Maybe this is for the best.  Instead of going out on some grand high-note that has people talking for years, we get to watch Feminist Frequency quietly fade into the background.  The backers all jumped ship.  At least the ones who actually wanted something for their money.  So now we are just watching the sad, broken leftovers that Anita and her man-slave are going to throw at us, just to be done with it.  And so am I.  This was the last one, because this video has perfectly summarized everything you need to know about this series, and what the future of this channel is.

Until next time, a quote,

“This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.” – T.S. Eliot

Peace out,


Lucien’s Logical Paradox #2

There is an argument that I’ve heard going around, and in some places have had people arguing that this value should be a law.  This argument makes no damn sense, and kind of beats this idea that feminism is a belief structure that stands with women into question.  Anyone who holds this belief is, in my opinion, horrifically sexist and believe that they should be allowed to tell women what to do with their own bodies.  I am talking, of course, about the belief that any man who has sex with a prostitute is committing rape.

Does that sound like hyperbole?  I’d understand if you believed that.  For real, I do.  That sounds so bat-shit crazy.  I mean, how can one possibly claim that the trade of sex for money is rape?  Well, according to the bat-shit factory of Puritan Feminism, it is because the fact of sex for money is, somehow, sex without her consent.  O-kay…how?  How does that work?

I can already hear the argument – women who are forced into prostitution.  Okay, fair enough.  Not even kidding, no one should be forced to do something that they don’t want to do, so I am totally against prostitution when it is someone who doesn’t have the choice to not do it.  Then there is another argument I can see coming – johns can sometimes go too far and have sex with a prostitute in a way that she doesn’t consent to.  Or can force himself on her.  I won’t argue with this point either.  Prostitution is a risky business.  Partly because it is illegal.  If we were to be legalized, then it could be controlled.  It could be put into businesses like one that I have spoken about (linked here).  If it were put into a business that could be regulated and have safety standards and security if johns go too far, then that would assuage a lot of the worries that people have about this profession.

So, those two things aside, it comes back to the issue of – how is sex for money rape?  Let me put a situation to you – a guy engages the services of a prostitute, has sex with her that is in no way violent, and then pays her the agreed-upon amount at the end of the transaction, how has she been violated?  If she knowingly-engaged the services of this man, and all parties involved got exactly what they asked for, then who is in the wrong?  I honestly want to know.  Anyone who wishes to comment, do so.  I don’t keep this place an echo chamber.  I have to approve new people, but I always do so, and after that, you have carte blanche to comment on any post on this site.

The strangest thing about modern feminism is that they go so far out of their way to make it seem like women have no agency in their sexual expression.  At least not the sex feminists like Anita Sarkeesian.  These people make it sound like sexual expression of any kind, outside of what they deem acceptable, demeans all women and is being brought on by disgusting males.  They also like to ignore the fact that lesbian and bisexual women exist, but I’ve talked at length about how two-faced their entire approach to dealing with the LB part of the LGBT community is hypocritical.  For those who want the Cliff Notes (is that still a thing?) version – lesbian and bisexual women don’t exist, unless they can be a shield.  Does that sexual expression appeal to lesbian or bisexual women?  Well, it’s still wrong!  Because…MAN!  It’s the go-to line for everything.  Not to mention saying that if something is intended to appeal to men, then who cares how they feel.  Hypocrisy is an art to these people.

The simple reality is – if you are going to argue that women have agency and are empowered, then the idea of prostitution as an acceptable avenue must be acknowledged.  Otherwise, you end up looking like the biggest fucking hypocrite, when people point out that there are women who enter the profession as either a means of financial desperation, or a way to get by when things are hard.  Same as the porn industry, which these people also rail against.  Because all porn is misogynistic, right?  Even the kind when the woman has all the power, nope, that’s misogyny.  Women wanting sex?  That’s unheard of!  Get your hijab back on!  Oh, I’m sorry, that’s another sex religion talking.  My bad.

Ladies, I don’t shame women because of how you choose to get by.  Be it stripping, being a cam girl, being in porn, or having sex for money.  We all get by in one way or another.  And let’s not forget that there are men who get into the industry as well.  Services for straight and gay sex for money is a real thing, involving men.  But let’s not muddy up the ideological waters with context.  The day that third-wave feminists acknowledge that is the day that I grow wings and fly.

Until next time, a quote,

“If religious people could listen to reason, then there would be no religious people.”  – Gregory House, House, M.D.

Peace out,


Being a Man is WRONG! Get it?! (A response to A Man’s Apology)

Are you a man?  Are you straight?  I’m bi, but I have a side of me that likes girls, so I am part of this demographic, to an extent.  If so, you are EVIL!  You are everything wrong with the world!  You are a liar!  You are a manipulator!  You are a duplicitous bastard that is every single thing wrong with the world.  For real, none of the world’s problems would exist without you.  Don’t believe me?!  Well, let’s take a look at this video, that spells out rather plainly just how awful you are.

Okay, all kidding aside, this video pisses me off. It’s the latest in a string of videos that has one purpose – to make men understand just how awful they are, and how we have been and are so awful to women.  Because women are perfect flowers who have no imperfections and NEVER lie or do anything wrong, right?  No woman has EVER cheated on a man, right?  No woman has EVER lied or used a man to an excessive degree, right?  Well, according to these pathetic beta-males, yeah.  Pretty much.

Then, of course, they have to flagellate themselves and praise the glory of women, because they are so evil.  That’s right.  All men are liars and pigs.  Us men are just animals who are looking to find ways to use and throw women away.  There are no words for how utterly enraged this makes me.  And they have to make sure to tell the women who watch this that being a man is just so wrong.  That testosterone that you have in your system?  That’s just society’s programming!  Fuck biology!  Hormones?  That’s just patriarchy talking!  No man actually feels those things.  They are just what society teaches us.  And, as they make sure to beat you over the head with, over and over again, it makes you bad.

What’s more, this video idolizes this weird trend in SJW, third-wave feminism that it’s wrong to like things.  Like sports?  That’s wrong!  Like lifting weights and being buff?  That’s wrong too!  Like thinking that pretty ladies are sexy?  Oh, that’s definitely wrong!  Why, when you see a woman and find her attractive, you see her as an object!  What’s that?  You see an attractive woman and think that this is someone you’d like to get to know better?  That’s bullshit!  So obviously a lie.  That’s what all us men are is liars.  As this video goes out of its way to make sure that we understand.

Ladies, I’m gonna let you in on something – this idea that all guys want the supermodels is false.  Some guys do.  But not all guys.  Everyone guy has different tastes.  Just like every woman.  It’s part of the human experience.  I can’t believe that I’m the one who has to explain this.  Oh, maybe I’m “mansplaining.”  Well, you know what – fuck it!  If this has to be spelled out to you, then so be it.  This mission to demonize men for liking what they like makes me sick!  Not to mention, once-again, I just love how lesbian and bisexual women are cut out of the conversation about sexual attraction to women.  Do people believe that if a girl is gay, she’s instantly enlightened and loves all body types equally.  That is bullshit!  My friend Erin likes girls who are smoking hot.  She keeps fun pictures that an ex of hers sent and looks at them whenever she wants a jolly in her pussy.  I’m sorry, but being gay or straight doesn’t instantly make a person a demon or a saint.  If you don’t know that, then that’s on you, not everyone else.

Then they get into cheating, and here they might have had a point.  But nope, they also have to make sure that they show that guys who watch porn are pieces of shit too.  That’s just like cheating!  More proof that third-wave feminism is Puritanical as fuck.  I find it so funny that so many of these beta-males and third-wave feminists are atheists.  Why?  They believe in the mindset of the church.  These women are prudish to the point that they might as well wear a hijab and follow Islam.  They do go so far out of their way to talk about how it is a “race” and that castigating it is wrong.  Just go all the way, ladies.  What do you have to lose?

And don’t even get me started when they talk about what it is to be the “perfect man.”  What the fuck do they know about being a man at all?!  When have these people ever done anything manly in their lives?!  Oh, but I can already hear the feminists –

Just because what they do is different than you, that doesn’t make it less ‘manly’, you misogynist pig!

What women buy into this mentality?  I’ll tell you who – women who have either never had a real relationship and really connected with someone, or women who have no interest in men altogether, so they figure that this is right for other women.  That’s it.  The guy Anita Sarkeesian has been dating, he’s not some pathetic beta male.  Though, that’s a bad example.  She’s a con artist, and he’s one of the people who taught her how to be.  The guy that Rebecca Watson has been bumping uglies with (last I heard) wasn’t a beta male either.  The kind of women who like men who are so utterly subservient and pathetic are the kinds of women who exploit that.  I used to be one of these kinds of guys.  I’ve gotten exploited.  But I learned my lesson.

Seeing stuff like this drives me nuts, because it’s another one of these pathetic videos that women who buy into the canards of third-wave, Puritan Feminism puts out.  They buy into the 1 in 5 rape statistic.  They buy into the 77 cents on the dollar statistic.  None of them are critical of anything they hear in their echo chamber.  So, this video will go into that echo chamber, where men in their early 20’s tells women EXACTLY what they think they want to hear.  Which leads, finally, to the moral of this pussy-whipping in action – Jesus loves you!  Love Jesus!

Though, when you really think about it, modern religion and modern feminism as so interchangeable that if you replaced Jesus with feminism, would you really see the difference?

Until next time, a quote,

“This video should be packaged and sold as an ipecac alternative.  And a vagina de-moisturizer.”  -Peter Broady

Peace out,


Is EVERYTHING A Gender Issue Now? (A response to The New York Times)

Something to know about me – I have a decently-ranged sexual history.  I won’t go into any details.  It isn’t your business.  I’m just giving context (a thing third-wave feminists hate) as to my perspective as I get into a discussion with all of you.  I have been with skinny women.  I have been with women who have a few extra pounds.  I have never gotten with a woman where her weight was a danger to her health.  It’s a turn-off for me, and it’s dangerous for them.  Unlike what SJWs say, the Body Mass Index is a real thing, and your weight does actually affect you.  Call me a misogynist or whatever.  I know who and what I am, and I have not used or mistreated anyone I have been close to.  As it so happens, I have a VERY high opinion of sex and sexual expression.  Intimacy is the best thing that our species has going for it.  With how shitty life is, sex and love are among the few solaces that we have from how ugly a world it is.  The journey to freely express that has been part of second-wave feminism, also known as the Sexual Liberation Movement.  Some fascinating history there, for anyone who looks it up.  Along with some of my favorite women throughout history.

That was a long intro paragraph.  There’s supposed to be an article in here, right?  Don’t worry, I didn’t forget.  I came across an article on my Twitter feed today in The New York Times where a bunch of women are deciding to “say ‘no’ to thongs.”  We have decided to make what underwear women wear into a battleground.  This is just another place where the insanity of this Neo-Victorian, puritanical, third-wave feminism has made everything into a gender issue.  It’s gotten ridiculous.  Here’s a link, now let’s talk about it.

A young generation of women is discovering a new brand of sexy in the most unlikely of places: their grandmothers’ underwear drawers.

What a great introduction.  For the days when this publication was known for high journalistic standards.  But we’ll see just how low this publication’s “standards” for good reporting are.

“Within millennial and Generation Y consumer groups, it’s considered cool to be wearing full-bottom underwear,” said Bernadette Kissane, an apparel analyst at the market intelligence firm Euromonitor. “Thongs have had their moment.”

Huh.  Maybe I spoke too soon.  My bad, NYT.  I’m sorry.  I just got wrapped up in certain gender issues, I abandoned my objectivity.  This seems like a pretty decent force.  Analyzing market forces is something that’s legit.  And this woman seems to be a from a source that has some credibility.  Well, continue.

“I only wear granny panties,” Julia Baylis, a willowy 22-year-old, declared proudly. Ms. Baylis and her best friend, Mayan Toledano, 27, design the boutique clothing label Me and You. Their best seller is a pair of white cotton underpants with the word “feminist” printed in pink bubble letters across the rear. Since the line’s introduction on April 7, the panties have sold out.

Uh-oh.  I get the feeling that we are seeing the start of the abandonment of objectivity.  This seems too much like promotion.  I mean, why bring up a company that makes underwear with the word “feminist” printed on it?  You could have talked about market forces and this would have been a solid article.  Please don’t tell me that the pandering has only just begun…

Ms. Baylis and Ms. Toledano are part of an all-female creative collective founded by Petra Collins called the Ardorous that explores feminist topics from a millennial point of view through collaborative and solo art projects. For the generation that counts both Beyoncé and Lena Dunham as feminist icons, female sexuality is wielded for one’s own pleasure.

And just like that, the objectivity of this article be damned!  It’s about feminism.  What could have maybe been an interesting look at the changes in sexual expression has to be a gender issue.  I also find it interesting that you bring up Beyonce and Lena Dunham.  The first is a mediocre musician who makes mediocre music.  The second is someone who has admitted sexually abusing her sister.  What fine examples of feminist icons.  I’m amazed that I didn’t see the likes of Anita Sarkeesian on here.  She is one of the biggest proponents of this Neo-Victorian mindset where everything is seen as sexist, unless the woman is dressed in a hijab.

“Most lingerie is designed to appeal to a man,” Ms. Baylis said. “For us, that’s not even a consideration. This is underwear you wear totally for you. Maybe no one will see it, or maybe you’ll put it up on Instagram to share with everyone you know.”

I’m getting really tired of this.  Once-again, I get to be the person who says that lesbians and bisexual women are being cut out of the conversation about sexual attraction in respect to women.  Why does NO ONE else find this insulting?  I can’t be the only one!  Come on, people!  Make your voices heard!  I’m not an SJW.  I don’t mod comments.  Can some lady who is into other ladies please point out that there are plenty of women who find women in sexy clothing appealing?  Please?  Anyone?  Can we not have a segregated conversation about attraction and sexual expression, that deliberately excludes women?  Really, can we do that?

That’s not to say Me and You’s customers don’t want to feel sexy; they absolutely do. “What’s sexy for us is being natural and comfortable,” Ms. Toledano said.

And that’s a choice you can make.  One that I believe that all women should and do have the right to make.  Wear what you find comfortable.  But why are you making underwear into a big feminist issue?  Is what a woman covers her privates with so big a gender topic?  Why?  And why do you want to make this into such a rallying-cry for gender, anyway?

“I think there’s a widespread misconception that men are into pearl thong, lace contraptions,” said Ms. Javitch of Ten Undies. “To be honest, men are into girls in T-shirts and white underwear.”

Okay, no.  Who the FUCK are you to be telling US what we like?!  Seriously, bitch, who the fuck do you think you are to dictate what other people like?!  God is that insulting!  I am a fan of all kinds of things on women, but I don’t just write a girl off because she is wearing something different.  I’ve been with girls who are into thongs.  I’ve been with girls who like regular white-cotton panties and ranges in-between.  I didn’t make something of it.  Who the fuck is this person to believe that she is the arbiter of male attraction.  It’s insulting.  Just like the last thing, we still have lesbians and bisexual women being excluded from the conversation about sexual attraction to women, and it’s fucking wrong!  I can’t be the only one bothered by this.

It’s a notion mainstream lingerie companies have been slow to embrace. As the gender gap among owners of small businesses continues to narrow, female entrepreneurs are becoming increasingly empowered to fill the void in the market.

Of course, because The New York Times has decided to abandon ANY form of objectivity, they agree with this person.  Yes, let’s let a person who has NO experience being a heterosexual man (though there are plenty of gay men that I have met who can, on a certain level, appreciate sexy clothes on a woman.  Just another example of segregation in talking about sexual expression) dictate what men like. You began with market forces.  That could actually be a real discussion.  Maybe about the changing views of sexuality.  There’s a real discussion to be had there.  Instead, you devolve into a gender-battle, because you know that that will get you clicks.  This article reeks of click-bait.  I guess I shouldn’t be surprised.

Ms. Dalbesio said she was hopeful that the greater diversity of offerings was a sign that the lingerie industry is beginning to recognize that “there is not one ‘ideal body,’ but a plethora of them.”

I find it so utterly ironic that an article that goes out of its way to shame the fashion industry and make HUGE assumptions about straight men can claim that this isn’t about culture bias.  Ms. Dalbesio, your statement reeks of bullshit.  Nice work.

Can we please STOP making every single fucking thing a gender battleground?  Please? Is that really asking too much?  I’m tired of hearing EVERY fucking day about how women are so oppressed and how men like me…well, not just like me.  I’m bi, so yeah.  I guess I’m half-evil, according to the third-wave feminist meter.  Still, I hate hearing about how straight men are just the worst and how women are being told that they are doing wrong and need to act a certain way.  Where this has gone in the realms of sexuality and sexual expression is even worse.  We are turning women into paranoid Puritans, believing that all men are rapists and how every form of sex that doesn’t get a verbal consent at every phase is rape.  The power of intimacy is being torn apart by modern feminism.  The women I admired so much, like Joan Jett and Janis Joplin would beat the shit out of these social justice warriors.  How many of them would lay down and let them beat them, because they are too weak to raise up to a woman who is attacking them?

Until next time, a quote,

“I grew up in a world that told girls they couldn’t play rock and roll.” – Joan Jett

Peace out,


You Are the Saddest Beta I Have Ever Seen (A response to Jamin Warren)

I want to introduce you all to a group of people.  These people are sad, lonely, pathetic individuals who make you so ashamed to share the same gender with them.  They are people who DESPERATELY try and suck up to a group of people, hoping to get them to notice that they exist, and maybe, just maybe, see what female sex parts look like.  Among their number are the likes of Ryan Wiley, Bob Chipman, No-Willy Wheaton, and the pretty much the entire writing staff at Kotaku that has a penis.  Another person that we can add to the list is the host of PBS Gameshow, Jamin Warren.  But, that name seems like too misleading.  I am going to take a cue from Jimmy Vega and give him a new one.  Let’s call him Hipster McGee.  Oh, right, we already called him that.  Well, let’s just keep that between us, eh?

Back to the point, the group of people that I am going to be introducing you to is the Beta Male.  Urban Dictionary defines Beta Males as –

An unremarkable, careful man who avoids risk and confrontation. Beta males lack the physical presence, charisma and confidence of the Alpha male.

I couldn’t have put it better myself.  Beta males are the most pathetic group of people.  Sadly, these types are becoming more and more common in the world today.  Why?  Well, that’s a question for smarter people than I.  From where I’m sitting, it’s because we now live in a world that tells men that their masculinity is bad and that they need to be more feminine.  To be clear, I have nothing against guys who are in touch with their feminine side.  I am.  But there is a fine line between being open to things like herbal rub for the chicken you are cooking, and making the kinds of video that Ryan Wiley makes.

Something to know about beta males is that they are complete ass-kissers.  The moment that they find a group that they can latch onto, they will do so.  Any group where they feel that they can be noticed and validated.  Also, any group where they think that there are women who will notice them.  That’s the other thing about beta males – they are straight.  The whole bunch of them.  Before you come at me, there is a difference between flaming queens and beta males.  Queens generally have some amount of charisma, to a certain demographic.  Betas have none.  Beta males will get with any group where they believe that there are women-folk who will notice that they have a penis, and think that they are worth letting them stick their penis into. They think if they suck up to a woman enough, then said woman will notice that they exist.  Case and point, let’s go back to Hipster McGee and a video he made, where he buries his face firmly up Anita Sarkeesian’s ass.

Notice how McGee has to make sure to put out that he believes everything that Anita believes.  Notice how he makes very clear that she is absolutely right.  Oh, and also pay close attention to how much he says that the world needs what she has to say.  It’s almost astounding.

Like every Puritan Feminist, McGee has to say that the stuff where you are in a strip club is “misogynistic.”  Of course it is.  Because no guy who doesn’t TOTALLY hate women would go to a strip club, right?  And, of course, the strippers are all just objects, right?  It always marvels me how sex – modern feminism is.  Like all women who work in the sex industry are just exploited whores. Don’t take that from me.  Watch Sarkeesian’s video on “Women as Background Decoration.”  There, she blatantly says that women who work in sex (or fictional sex, as the case may be) are objects, viewed as objects by men in the real world.  What evidence does she have for this?  None.  None at all.  Her evidence is conjecture and speculation and HUGE assertions that are in no way backed by fact.  Actually, a recent study was done that shows that games do NOT cause sexism.  Evidence has a bad habit of unraveling the Puritan Feminist talking points, doesn’t it?

When you listen to McGee talk about how much we need Anita, citing what trolls say like it’s indicative for the community at large, you can’t help but think that you’ve heard this before, don’t you?  You can’t help but think that maybe this is nothing new.  Like maybe guys like him are many.  Men who can’t wait to tell Anita how awesome and smart and perfect she is.  Internet Aristocrat made a fairly fantastic video on the subject, which I recommend you check out.  See all the betas, working so hard to get their cookie from Anita-senpai.

Maybe you need a better example of betas and feminism.  That’s what it all amounts to. Beta males attach themselves to feminism, for the express purpose of wanting to get women to notice them.  They will swear up and down that they believe in the cause, but I guarantee that if you look at how much they work to kiss the ass of the women in that movement who have name recognition, then you will see these people for the sad little fanboys that they are, waiting to get a treat.

People like Hipster McGee and his ilk will tell us that women and minorities in gaming get so ragged on and mistreated.  That they feel so unwelcome.  Didn’t you see some of those comments?!  Women have mean things said to them!  The horror!  But let’s do a side-by-side comparison of XOXO Fest, an SJW event, and a fighting game tournament.  You tell me what you see.

DiversityYou now what I see at XOXO Fest – a lot of sad, pathetic, white men.  Men who believe that their senpai will notice them and that they are the ones who embrace diversity.  Another trait they all have in common – they are college age men.  The beta males go to colleges and are told about how awful men are, how “rape culture” is everywhere, and how women are so horribly mistreated and hated by society.  Three things that are blatantly untrue, but because they have no backbone and no ability to question things, they just take it at face value.  They “Listen and Believe.”

I became an atheist because I was disillusioned by the lies and manipulations of one religion.  Why on Earth would I join another?  Oh, and while we’re talking about diversity in gaming, here’s some screenshots from an event called “Celebrating Diversity.”

Celebrating DiversityBecause pink-haired white people is diversity, right?

Until next time, a quote,

“If being an egomaniac means I believe in what I do and in my art or music, then in that respect you can call me that… I believe in what I do, and I’ll say it.” – John Lennon

Peace out,


Your Defense of Jackie is Weak (A response to Jessica Valenti)

Here’s a thing to know about Puritan Feminists – they will never, ever admit when they’re wrong.  If they’re shown to be wrong, without any form of doubt, then they just double-down on how right they are.  These people truly are the liberal equivalent of the Tea Party.  The progressive-left is the new tea party-right, and nowhere has it been so spectacularly on display than with the events surrounding the supposed rape that Rolling Stone reporter Sabrina Rubin Erdely reported on.  A reporter went out into the world, with the understanding that she was going to find a story about college rape, and without even the slightest bit of journalistic skepticism, she found one.  From a woman whose narrative doesn’t stand up to any scrutiny.  Recently, the police came out with a report that absolutely none of Jackie’s story could be corroborated.  None of it.  The entire thing was fabricated.  There is evidence of this.  All the feminists who came out in support of Jackie, you’d think, would now have some egg on their face.  But nope!  Now they’ve got entitled white suburbanite defender Jessica Valenti doubling-down on it.  Why?  Well, let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

In another intellectually-void article in The Guardian, (linked here) Valenti lays out why – just because Jackie’s entire story, from first to last, is false, doesn’t mean that she wasn’t the victim of a crime!  I partially agree with Valenti.  She wasn’t the victim of a crime.  She was the perpetrator of one.  And, if you ask me, Jackie should spend some time behind bars.  Let’s get started.

“No evidence” of a rape does not mean that a rape didn’t happen. But try telling that to anyone of a number of media outlets who, when the Charlottesville Police Department released their findings on “Jackie” (the University of Virginia student whose alleged rape was at the center of a widely-disputed Rolling Stone article) essentially indicated to their readers that nothing happened to her.

The matter isn’t that there is no evidence of a rape, Jessica.  The matter at hand is – Jackie’s entire story was fabricated.  Every single part of it that she told police has been exposed as a lie.  Not only that, but Jackie refused to work with the police investigation.  Why would that be?  Wouldn’t she want the police to get to the bottom of her case if she was raped, so that justice could be served?  I can already hear the feminist apologists – “Women who go through rape are often tormented and mistreated by the police!  She might have felt unsure of her safety!  She didn’t want to relive the event!”  These people are worse than creationists.  The truth is that rape is taken very seriously in this country.  Why do you think that the media blitz was so big after the article in Rolling Stone?

The fact is – there is absolutely zero evidence to corroborate anything that Jackie said happened.  That, combined with her refusal to cooperated with the authorities has people thinking that she might have, you know, lied.  Because she did.

Longo echoed what anti-rape experts have been saying all along: while holes in Jackie story could mean that she lied about some things, either to the reporter or the dean to whom she originally spoke, it doesn’t necessarily mean she lied about being raped.

Wow.  What would it take, Jessica, for Jackie’s credibility to be damaged, to you?  I asked because here are a few things the police were able to uncover in their investigation –

The fraternity (Phi Kappa Psi) was not having a party the weekend when the rape was supposed to have occurred
The fraternity members that Jackie accused of raping her weren’t even part of that fraternity
The party supposedly happened during the fall, and that the rape was a hazing ritual for new pledges.  Phi Kappa Psi wasn’t taking new pledges in the fall.
She says that she was told by her friends not to go to the police.  Her friends told her to go to police, even pushing her to do so. (which makes the fact that she refused to work with the authorities that much more damning)
Her statement about being horribly beaten was contradicted by her friends, who said that she did not look injured.
The number of people that Jackie claims raped her has continually inflated over time.
New evidence has come forward that the men that she says raped her don’t even EXIST

This evidence has made this pretty much open-and-shut.  Jackie lied.  Her entire story was fabricated.  It was fabricated to sell a narrative that a shitty reporter with a chip on her shoulder was looking to sell.  What more evidence will it take for you to accept that Jackie’s story was a lie?

To sexual assault experts, “false reporting” is frequently recognized not as an indication that the victim is lying about being raped, but that she may be changing the circumstances of her attack in an effort to make her story more empathetic in a culture that largely disbelieves victims.

Are you fucking kidding me?!  Wow!  Just…unbelievable!  Her completely fabricated story is just her way of trying to make herself more empathetic to us EVIL Americans who think that all women who get raped as asking for it.  That’s the narrative that you’re trying to push?  Just once, I wish that one of you Puritan Feminists didn’t have a narrative.  Objectively, it cannot be denied that Jackie’s story was a lie, from the ground up.  Where the people who she says attacked her may not even exist.  For you to say that it’s totally cool for her to make a false allegation is insane.  It’s insane because it sets a VERY dangerous precedent.  One that, I guarantee you, would be used against men.  Because if we are just supposed to believe women who claim to be raped, when there is no supporting evidence, and the evidence they gave is uncovered to be lies, then we are throwing the entire criminal justice system under the bus!  Because then it isn’t innocent until proven guilty.  It’s guilty because she says so, and any evidence against her means nothing.

The center’s research showed that even when a woman has been raped, it’s “quite common” for victims to change the details of the attack: they may say they were assaulted vaginally because talking about oral or anal rape is too embarrassing; they may blame the attack on a stranger because the actual perpetrator is their partner; they may lie about drinking alcohol, taking drugs or other behaviors they think might undermine their credibility.

You see, Jessica, you raise a good point.  That’s why rape is so hard to prosecute.  Typically, there isn’t any physical evidence.  So it all comes down to he-said she-said.  Because our criminal justice system is designed with a person being innocent until proven guilty, that’s the name of the game.  Don’t like it?  Too bad!  Guilt has to be proven, beyond a reasonable doubt.  If that doubt still exists after all the evidence is gathered, then that’s how it goes.  If you don’t like that, I’m sorry, but that’s how it goes.  Deal with it.

The truth is that we don’t know what happened to Jackie, and likely never will. She never wanted to make a police report – and apparently still doesn’t – and, given how she was thrown under the bus by Rolling Stone, it’s extremely unlikely that she’ll ever trust the media. But here’s what we do know: it’s much more likely for a rape victim to lie about the details of her attack than for a woman to fabricate a sexual assault whole cloth. Until we stop blaming women for being raped and start to build a culture where women feel safe telling their whole stories, we’ll never know the full truth of sexual assault.

It’s so easy, Jessica, to simply accept that a person has no flaws, isn’t it?  You can just log any any all disagreement away with the rest of the opinions, saying that you’re right, because “rape culture.”  But here’s the thing – there is no rape culture.  Not in this country, anyway.  You give vague statements about how the public doesn’t believe rape victims, when this whole media blitz that surrounded Jackie’s story shows that the public takes rape very seriously.  The Star Chambers that universities are implementing, where the accused rapists are not even given due process are popping up all over the place.  If there is one group of people who are clearly well-represented in respect to sexual crimes, it’s women who claim to be raped.

You know who doesn’t have any representation?  The accused?  From the Duke lacrosse players, whose lives were ruined, to a fraternity who can thank a terrible reporter for dragging their name through the mud (for which they should rightly sue Rolling Stone for everything they’re worth!).  But hey, at least at Duke, there was some justice for that injustice.  The overzealous prosecutor for that case got disbarred.  What justice will be met here?  Will Jackie go to jail, as she rightly should, for filing a false accusation?  I doubt it.  After all, the police haven’t even technically closed the case.  Probably out of fear of being endlessly harassed by the Puritan Feminist lynch mobs who would harass them about that endlessly.

Say that I’m being too harsh.  Maybe you’re right.  But when I read an article talking about how false allegations of rape should not only be accepted, but also believed, that drives me up the fucking wall!  Puritan Feminists don’t care about facts!  They don’t care about evidence!  They don’t care about the truth! The facts have unmasked a person who has clearly lied needs to go to jail for False Allegation, and they don’t care.  They double-down.  Why?

Because name me a Puritan Feminist who doesn’t have a narrative to sell.  They all do.  It’s all they really have.

Until next time, a quote,

“It is bad when one thing becomes two. One should not look for anything else in the Way of the Samurai. It is the same for anything that is called a Way. If one understands things in this manner, he should be able to hear about all ways and be more and more in accord with his own.”  -Hagakure

Peace out,


The UVA Story Ends Here

After extensive investigation by the police, to which an article in The New York Times stated that the girl who levied the accusation, “Jackie,” was not cooperative with the police, it has been discovered that there  is no substantial evidence that any of what she said in her Rolling Stone article happened.  After all their work, the police have found that everything that “Jackie” said was false.  While that doesn’t prove that she was not the victim of rape, it does prove that her entire story was fabricated, and now we are having to actually look with cold eyes at what happened.  I mean to lay out what this means and what should happen next.  Because what happened here is such a farce and displays so much of the bitter truths about universities and how they and society at large looks at cases like Jackie’s.

First, the girl herself, Jackie, should be taken in and charged with levying a false accusation.  I know that sounds harsh, but with all the insanity, along with this girl’s refusal to cooperate with law enforcement, she should face legal repercussions.  This girl has done so much damage to the cause of prosecuting actual rape, because now the culture is going to be even more critical.  Though maybe that’s for the best, in some ways.  After all, look at how many Puritan Feminists came out and claimed that they stand with Jackie, regardless of how there was no evidence.  It’s time that this girl discovered that your actions have consequences.  This critical nature that people are gaining may be for the best, because the last thing we need are more cases like Jackie’s.  Although, the police haven’t technically closed the case, even though there is no evidence.  And the only witness they have, Jakie, has absolutely zero credibility at this point.

Next, the reporter who wrote that article for Rolling Stone should be fired.  This should have happened ages ago.  She displayed everything wrong with modern journalism, by taking a story from a single source and not doing even the bare minimum of fact-checking.  She started a media shit-storm that she defended, even as the truth was coming to light from The Washington Post.  This person is a terrible journalist.  She should be fired and, to be honest, her career should be totally destroyed.  Her credibility has been.  What publication will hire a person who fabricates their story?

Also, Phi Kappa Psi fraternity should sue Rolling Stone for their part in all this.  It was their terrible reporting and destroyed their reputation and got them black-listed in their own university.  If they are able to bounce back from this, it will be surprising.  Now the publication that tarred and feathered them should be held to the fire and be taken for everything they are worth.

Then there are the university Star Chambers that we are seeing on colleges.  Universities are expelling and suspending students for crimes like rape and sexual harassment, without going through any due process.  With the former of these, that’s just insane.  If you believe that a crime has occurred, then you have a legal OBLIGATION to go to the police.  Young men are having their academic futures destroyed without even getting the right to defend themselves.  Already, young men who have suffered this are coming back with legal teams and universities are losing money.  As they rightly should.  When you have a system of justice that assumes guilt and doesn’t follow due process, then you have broken the law and you should be held liable.  I hope these colleges lose a ton of money.  That’s at least a small way to get some satisfaction against a system that treats men like we are the enemy.

But lastly, and most important – this should serve as a lesson to people.  We live in a society where people believe in a mythical “rape culture.”  One that I have seen absolutely zero evidence that exists.  This idea that all over our society are things that promote rape is beyond absurd.  We gamers have been the most recent target of that.  Endless reports of people being sent death and rape threats, by trolls on the Internet who are just doing it for the lulz, and because the people who report these threats are professional victims who feed them to keep the money flowing in.  The reaction to what happened at UVA highlights everything that’s wrong with modern feminism.  There was even a Tweet where someone said that “‘evidence’ is an invention of cis males.  It has no place in the real world.”  A statement so insane that destructive that it goes to show the thinking of Puritan Feminists.

They don’t care about evidence.  They don’t care about reason.  They will take things on faith and buy it without a second thought.  I don’t know about the rest of you, but I ditched religion a long time ago!  This kind of neo-Victorian fear of sex by third-wave feminists is destroying all the work that the sexual liberation movement fought so hard for.  It’s so blatantly obvious that they are afraid of sex.  And when you have them being supported by the culture at large, with the police not being willing to put away a person whose accusation was now proven to have no substance of any kind in jail, what do you think is going to happen next?  Why, justice will continue to not be served!  These Social Justice Warriors don’t care about actual justice.  They don’t care about real rape victims.

I have seen some of the most insane statements from these people.  One woman claimed to need feminism because of “stare rape.”  Another woman said that “birth rape” is a real thing.  These people are basically making any form of intimacy where the man didn’t ask for permission each and every step of the way into rape.  Is that the world that you all want to live in?  Because I don’t!  Third-wave feminists are exposing just how ugly the modern views of sex are.

So yeah, the story is done, and now some justice needs to be served.  Since I know that the entire world reads what I have to say and will totally go out and do my suggestions *read sarcasm*, I look forward to what happens next.

Until next time, a quote,

Do not spread false reports. Do not help a guilty person by being a malicious witness.”  -Exodus 23:1

Peace out,